Making the Abolition of War a Realistic Goal (Dutch)
This popular essay, first published in 1980, provides a brief introduction to civilian-based defense, a policy in which civilians are prepared to use nonviolent resistance as a means of national defense. This essay won the Ira D. and Miriam G. Wallach Awards Competition 1979-1980.
--Taken from aeinstein.org
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
AFSCHAFFING VAN OORLOG ALS EEN REALISTIES DOEL
Oorlog als alternatief voor onmacht
Een vervangende defensie-politiek?
Bronnen van macht voor een nieuwe politiek
Verzet tegen de zwakke punten van diktaturen
Omwapening: van militaire naar sociale verdediging
De konsekwenties van sociale verdediging
Het scheppen van een keuze-mogelijkheid
ONDERZOEK NAAR NIEUWE
KEUZEN IN KONFLIKT EN DEFENSIE
Het zoeken naar oplossingen
Sankties en politiek geweld
Alternatieve geweldloze sankties
Onderzoek en beleidsstudies
Gelegenheden in het onderwijs
Netwerk Sociale Verdediging Nederland
The destructiveness of modern war is widely understood. Yet most governments, backed by their populations, amass the largest array of military weaponry and forces of which they are capable. Clearly, none of the past proposals and movements to abolish war and to bring in an era of world peace has succeeded. Indeed, in significant respects the achievement of those goals now seems less likely than it did in earlier decades.
This is, of course, not the only grave political problem we have failed to solve. Others include dictatorship, genocide, systems of social oppression, and popular powerlessness. They must be considered as we seek a solution to the problem of war.
Most people respond to the continuation of wars and war preparation with a sense of resignation, hopelessness, or powerlessness. "War is inevitable," it is thought; we blame "human nature" or our favorite "evil forces." Other persons faithfully persist in plodding the old paths to the now tarnished dreamsï¿½without reexamining whether they are headed in the right direction. Still others try to run faster to their goal, or seek shortcuts, or carry out acts of desperationï¿½without a basis for confidence that their efforts can succeed either, or even certainty that they will not make matters worse.
All this is not good. More creative responses are possible. Indeed, it is our responsibility to seek to develop them. If soundly based and realistically developed and applied, the might offer new hope.
|Powered by Sigsiu.NET|