As Stephen Zunes writes, whether or not a movement is primarily violent or nonviolent, what is important is whether it employs strategies and tactics that can maximize its chances of success. A reply to Nader Hashemi’s “Syria, savagery, and self-determination: what those against military intervention are missing.”
opendemocracy.net
September 23, 2013
From the article: The worsening violence and repression in Syria has left many analysts and policymakers in the United States and other western countr…
In Syria, mixing violent and nonviolent resistance jeopardized people power, particularly when violence became the main driver of resistance from earl…
From the article: Although we now hear guns more than peaceful chants in Syria, and while the news of armed rebellion overshadows discussion of nonvio…
This book represents a preliminary examination of nonviolent political struggle in the Arab world. Though the authors opinions and points of view on t…